TRO / Schedule A 案件

26-cv-4061

案件基础信息

案件号
26-cv-4061
立案日期
2026-04-13
原告品牌
CELINE 赛琳
原告律所
Kossof IPR
起诉州
IL
侵权类型
商标

案件进程

编号日期案件进程
232026-05-11ORDER: ORDER Signed by the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 5/11/2026. Mailed notice (gel,)
202026-04-22MINUTES: MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's motion for a one-week extension of time to file a supplemental memorandum regarding joinder and personal jurisdiction [19] is granted. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint or supplemental memorandum by 4/28/26. Mailed notice (gel,)
192026-04-21Extension of Time
182026-04-14MINUTES: MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: This case has been assigned to Judge LaShonda A. Hunt. Upon review of the trademark infringement complaint and other filings, the Court questions whether Plaintiff has established sufficient grounds for joinder of all 13 defendants under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20. See Viking Arm AS v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A, No. 24 C 1566, 2024 WL 2953105 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024). Indeed, Plaintiff filed a form complaint with generic allegations about coordinated counterfeiting activity between 13 defendants without any details whatsoever, which arguably violates the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8 and 10. The Court also questions whether Plaintiff has shown that the Court can exercise personal jurisdiction over the defendants. To adequately plead personal jurisdiction, Plaintiff must sufficiently allege that the defendants actually sold the allegedly infringing product to a customer in Illinois. See Liu v. Monthly, No. 25-2074, 2026 WL 880018, at *1 (7th Cir. Mar. 31, 2026) (citing Curry v. Revolution Lab'ys, LLC, 949 F.3d 385, 400 (7th Cir. 2020)). The complaint alleges sales in this district, but those allegations are conclusory, and Plaintiff did not provide proof of actual sales in this district. See id. (remanding with instructions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction because plaintiff had not provided screenshot evidence of actual sales in Illinois). Additionally, Plaintiff has not established good cause under Local Rule 26.2 or Seventh Circuit precedent to justify sealing the names of defendants or documents pertaining to alleged infringing activity. "Secrecy makes little sense if the goal of the litigation is to protect rightsholders' IP interests by obtaining an injunction against defendants' sales of infringing or counterfeit goods." See Eicher Motors Ltd. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", 794 F. Supp. 3d 543, 552 (N.D. Ill. 2025). More importantly, this presumption of sealing runs counter to the well-established authority of this Circuit holding that "[m]any a litigant would prefer that the subject of the case. be kept from the curious (including its business rivals and customers), but the tradition that litigation is open to the public is of very long standing." See Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. Leavell, 220 F.3d 562, 567-568 (7th Cir. 2000). Plaintiff also did not file a motion to seal those documents. Similarly, Plaintiff submitted two declarations [8][9] wherein the declarants assert that Plaintiff requires a temporary restraining order, but Plaintiff has not moved for such relief. Counsel is admonished to review and comply with all court procedures and applicable rules. The Clerk of Court is directed to unseal the documents filed at [2] [10]. By 4/21/26, Plaintiff must file either a memorandum explaining why joinder and personal jurisdiction are proper, or an amended complaint specifically naming and identifying each defendant being sued and setting forth with more than conclusory statements the alleged infringing activity and grounds for personal jurisdiction. Failure to do so will result in the current complaint being dismissed without prejudice and this case being closed. Plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process [13] and motion for issuance of summons [14] are denied without prejudice. Mailed notice (gel,)
152026-04-13MOTION: NOTICE of Motion by Paul Joseph Kossof for presentment of motion for miscellaneous relief, 13, motion for miscellaneous relief 14 before Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 4/21/2026 at 10:00 AM.
142026-04-13MOTION: MOTION by Plaintiff Celine S.A.for order directing clerk to issue summons.
132026-04-13MOTION: MOTION by Plaintiff Celine S.A.for electronic service of process. 4 attachments
122026-04-13EXHIBIT: Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Nicolas Lambert by Celine S.A. 1 attachment
112026-04-13SCHEDULES: Schedule A to the Complaint by Celine S.A.
2026-04-13ADMIN: CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (Text entry; no document attached.)
2026-04-13ADMIN: CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (Text entry; no document attached.)
102026-04-13DECLARATION: SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Celine S.A. Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Nicolas Lambert 1 attachment
92026-04-13DECLARATION: DECLARATION of Nicolas Lambert 1 attachment
82026-04-13DECLARATION: DECLARATION of Paul Kossof 3 attachments
72026-04-13Trademark Report by Celine S.A.
62026-04-13NOTICE: Notice of Claim Involving Trademarks by Celine S.A.
52026-04-13NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Celine S.A.
42026-04-13APPEARANCE: ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Celine S.A. by Paul Joseph Kossof
32026-04-13ADMIN: CIVIL Cover Sheet
22026-04-13SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Celine S.A. Schedule A
12026-04-13COMPLAINT: COMPLAINT filed by Celine S.A.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24969049. 4 attachments

免费评估

如您已收到与本案件号相关的 TRO 邮件,可花 30 秒填写评估表,快速获取和解或应诉建议,并初步了解预计处理成本。

立即评估

案件咨询

如你已经收到平台冻结、律师函、TRO 通知或想进一步判断案件影响,可以直接联系我们团队做下一步咨询。

立即咨询
TRO查询 最新资讯 关于我们 联系我们