TRO / Schedule A 案件

26-cv-4893

案件基础信息

案件号
26-cv-4893
立案日期
2026-04-29
原告品牌
WEAVER 枪支配件
原告律所
HSP
起诉州
IL
侵权类型
商标

案件进程

编号日期案件进程
352026-07-02MINUTES: MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of R. 34, the Plaintiff shall file a supplement with supporting evidence that the allegedly infringing good was actually shipped and received into Illinois. The supplement is due by 07/13/2026. The tracking status hearing of 07/03/2026 is reset to 07/24/2026 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Emailed notice
342026-06-17EXHIBIT: SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC Exhibit A regarding status report 33
332026-06-17ADMIN: STATUS Report by Revelyst Operations, LLC
322026-06-12MINUTES: MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The noticed motions 26, 30 are taken under advisement. The tracking status hearing of 07/10/2026 is accelerated to 07/03/2026 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Emailed notice
312026-06-10MOTION: NOTICE of Motion by Michael A. Hierl for presentment of motion for temporary restraining order, 26, motion to expedite 30 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 6/18/2026 at 08:30 AM.
302026-06-10MOTION: MOTION by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC to expedite Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery
292026-06-10EXHIBIT: SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC Exhibit A regarding memorandum in support of motion, 27
282026-06-10EXHIBIT: SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC Exhibit 2 to Mills Declaration regarding memorandum in support of motion, 27
272026-06-10BRIEF: MEMORANDUM by Revelyst Operations, LLC in support of motion for temporary restraining order, 26 7 attachments
262026-06-10MOTION: MOTION by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC for temporary restraining order Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and/or Electronic Publication
252026-06-09MINUTES: MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: (1.) The Plaintiff's motion 22 to reassign 1:26-cv-06246 is denied. When defendants are improperly joined, as the original defendants were in this case, there is no reason to think that the cases are then related under Local Rule 40.4. The Defendants have no connection other than the alleged infringement of the same trademark. So the cases are not susceptible of disposition in a single proceeding. And given the need to set individualized damages (including statutory damages, Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Star Amusements, Inc., 44 F.3d 485, 488 (7th Cir. 1995) (in setting statutory damages, courts may consider willfulness, the scope and circumstances of the infringement, and deterrence) (cited by Shenzhen Huajie Tech. Co. v. Shenzhen Leyibei Tech. Co., USCA No. 25-2659, 2026 WL 1165558, at *2 (7th Cir. Apr. 29, 2026)), there is no reason why handling of both cases by the same judge would result in saving of judicial time and effort. Lastly, 1:26-cv-06246 did not include the sole remaining defendant in this case, so it was not the refiling of a previously dismissed case. The motion is denied. (2.) The Plaintiff shall file a status report by 06/19/2026, setting forth the proposed plan forward, now that the deadline to file a motion for early discovery, see R. 19, 24, has expired. Emailed notice
242026-06-03MINUTES: MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint, R. 20, naming one Defendant. No motion for early discovery was filed by 05/29/2026, R. 19. Plaintiff's motion to reassign case 26 C 4893 22 is under review. The tracking status hearing set for 06/05/2026 is reset to 07/10/2026 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Emailed notice
232026-05-29MOTION: NOTICE of Motion by Michael A. Hierl for presentment of motion to reassign case 22 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 6/4/2026 at 08:30 AM.
222026-05-29MOTION: MOTION by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC to reassign case Plaintiff's Motion to Reassign Case No. 26-cv-6246 2 attachments
212026-05-27SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC Amended Schedule A
202026-05-27COMPLAINT: AMENDED complaint by Revelyst Operations, LLC against The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Amended Schedule A Hereto 1 attachment
192026-05-18MINUTES: MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: (1.) The Plaintiff's motion 14 for extra pages is granted. Given the goal of asset restraint, the motion 8 to file under seal is granted. (2.) On review of the complaint, Schedule A, and the TRO brief, the TRO motion 15 is denied without prejudice. First, the Court raises the propriety of joinder of the 10 Defendants, R. 9. Unless the Court is missing something, neither the complaint nor the brief in support of the TRO motion explain the basis for joinder. The Plaintiff shall review the opinion in Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. v. Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182, 18789 (N.D. Ill. 2020), and file a memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder by 05/29/2026. In lieu of the memorandum, by the same deadline, the Plaintiff may file an amended complaint with (a) one defendant or (b) a subset of the defendants along with a memo explaining why joinder of those defendants is proper. (3.) No prima facie case for personal jurisdiction has been established. The contention that availability to Illinois would establish prima facie jurisdiction anywhere in the country. Having said that, for purposes of granting expedited discovery, it would be appropriate to allow the Plaintiff to obtain information on personal jurisdiction. Under Liu v. Monthly, 170 F.4th 1090, 109394(7th Cir. 2026), the Plaintiff must be able to show at least one sale of an infringing product into Illinois to establish personal jurisdiction. If the early discovery does not reveal a sale of an infringing product into Illinois, then personal jurisdiction will not be established. The Court raises this issue on its own given the ex parte, non-adversarial presentation at this stage of the case. Federal courts must carefully review filings when presented by just one side in an ex parte setting. See American Can Co. v. Mansukhani, 742 F.2d 314, 325 (7th Cir. 1984) (explaining that courts must "carefully consider" the need for TROs given the ex parte context); In re Grand Jury Proceedings of Special April 2002 Grand Jury, 347 F.3d 197, 205 (7th Cir. 2003) (explaining that the court had "conducted a careful in camera and ex parte review" of the record). The Plaintiff may file a motion for early discovery (a subset of the current TRO motion) by 05/29/2026. (4.) To track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called), a tracking status hearing is set for 06/05/2026 at 8:30 a.m. Mailed notice.
182026-05-12MOTION: NOTICE of Motion by Michael A. Hierl for presentment of motion to seal document 8, motion for temporary restraining order, 15, motion for leave to file excess pages 14 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 5/19/2026 at 08:30 AM.
172026-05-12EXHIBIT: SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC Exhibit 2 to Mills Declaration regarding memorandum in support of motion, 16
162026-05-12BRIEF: MEMORANDUM by Revelyst Operations, LLC in support of motion for temporary restraining order, 15 7 attachments
152026-05-12MOTION: MOTION by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC for temporary restraining order Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and/or Electronic Publication
142026-05-12MOTION: MOTION by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC for leave to file excess pages Plaintiff's Motion to Exceed Page Limitation
132026-04-29MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials
122026-04-29MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA
2026-04-29ADMIN: CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (Text entry; no document attached.)
2026-04-29ADMIN: CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (Text entry; no document attached.)
112026-04-29NOTICE: Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Revelyst Operations, LLC
102026-04-29NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Revelyst Operations, LLC
92026-04-29SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC Sealed Schedule A
82026-04-29MOTION: MOTION by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal
72026-04-29APPEARANCE: ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC by Elizabeth Aubree Miller
62026-04-29APPEARANCE: ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC by John Wilson
52026-04-29APPEARANCE: ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC by Robert Payton Mcmurray
42026-04-29APPEARANCE: ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC by William Benjamin Kalbac
32026-04-29APPEARANCE: ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC by Michael A. Hierl
22026-04-29ADMIN: CIVIL Cover Sheet
12026-04-29COMPLAINT: COMPLAINT filed by Revelyst Operations, LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25046099. 1 attachment

免费评估

如您已收到与本案件号相关的 TRO 邮件,可花 30 秒填写评估表,快速获取和解或应诉建议,并初步了解预计处理成本。

立即评估

案件咨询

如你已经收到平台冻结、律师函、TRO 通知或想进一步判断案件影响,可以直接联系我们团队做下一步咨询。

立即咨询
TRO查询 最新资讯 关于我们 联系我们