墨婷跨境
MOT CROSS-BORDER
微信号: Mooting2018
墨婷跨境
MOT CROSS-BORDER
| 编号 | 日期 | 案件进程 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-07-21 | COMPLAINT filed by VIZ Media, LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25414295. |
| 2 | 2026-07-21 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff VIZ Media, LLC Schedule A to Complaint (Quezada Hastings, Sofia) |
| 3 | 2026-07-21 | CIVIL Cover Sheet (Quezada Hastings, Sofia) |
| 4 | 2026-07-21 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff VIZ Media, LLC by Sofia Quezada Hastings (Quezada Hastings, Sofia) |
| 5 | 2026-07-21 | MOTION by Plaintiff VIZ Media, LLC for leave to file Certain Documents Under Seal (Quezada Hastings, Sofia) |
| — | 2026-07-21 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Albert Berry, III. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). |
| — | 2026-07-21 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 6 | 2026-07-22 | MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. |
| 7 | 2026-07-22 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials. |
| 8 | 2026-07-23 | AMENDED complaint by VIZ Media, LLC against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
| 9 | 2026-07-30 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: On 7/21/26, Plaintiff filed a trademark and copyright infringement complaint, seeking to sue 83 separate defendants, see 1, 2. Once the case was assigned to this Court, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint 8, which identifies just one defendant on the attached Schedule A and thus avoids any joinder issues. But the amended complaint remains drafted as if it still targets multiple Defendants. Given the disconnect and ambiguity, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's amended complaint 8 ; if Plaintiff wishes to proceed, it must conform its allegations to the current Schedule A. The Court denies as moot Plaintiff's motion for leave to file the initial Schedule A under seal 5. Finally, because counsel's appearance form indicates that Plaintiff's attorney is a member of the Court's general bar, but not the trial bar, see 4, the Court reminds counsel that strict compliance with LR 83.12 is expected. Mailed notice. |