| 编号 | 日期 | 案件进程 |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | 06/30/2026 | MINUTES MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, 14. This dismissal took effect without court intervention. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Waetzig v. Haliburton Energy Servs., 145 S. Ct. 690, 694 (2025). The initial status hearing set for 7/2/2026 is vacated. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. |
| 14 | 06/18/2026 | DISMISSAL NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Catherine Frances Rayner as to the Defendant(s) identified on Amended Schedule A |
| 13 | 05/26/2026 | MINUTES MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Initial status hearing is set for 7/2/2026 at 9:00 a.m. in person in Courtroom 2325. By 6/25/2026, the parties shall file an initial joint status report. By 6/19/26, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for want of personal jurisdiction. Plaintiff has not adequately established personal jurisdiction. The Seventh Circuit has, in some cases, found the existence of specific personal jurisdiction in trademark, copyright, and patent infringement suits against online retailers, but only when the defendant has shipped the allegedly infringing products to the forum state. See, e.g., NBA Props., Inc. v. HANWJH, 46 F.4th 614, 62223 (7th Cir. 2022). Absent fulfillment and shipment of an order into the forum state, the operation of an "interactive" online storefront is insufficient to establish personal jurisdiction. See Advanced Tactical Ordnance Sys., LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc., 751 F.3d 796, 803 (7th Cir. 2014) ("Having an interactive website. should not open a defendant up to personal jurisdiction in every spot on the planet where that interactive website is accessible."). Mailed notice. 1 attachment |
| 12 | 05/21/2026 | MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 11 | 05/21/2026 | SCHEDULES Amended Schedule A to the Complaint 1 and Schedule A 2 by Catherine Frances Rayner |
| — | 05/21/2026 | ADMIN CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (Text entry; no document attached.) |
| — | 05/21/2026 | ADMIN CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (Text entry; no document attached.) |
| 10 | 05/20/2026 | APPEARANCE ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Catherine Frances Rayner by Adam Grodman |
| 9 | 05/20/2026 | APPEARANCE ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Catherine Frances Rayner by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre |
| 8 | 05/20/2026 | APPEARANCE ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Catherine Frances Rayner by Christopher Romero |
| 7 | 05/20/2026 | APPEARANCE ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Catherine Frances Rayner by Monica Rita Martin |
| 6 | 05/20/2026 | APPEARANCE ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Catherine Frances Rayner by Yi Bu |
| 5 | 05/20/2026 | APPEARANCE ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Catherine Frances Rayner by Yanling Jiang |
| 4 | 05/20/2026 | APPEARANCE ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Catherine Frances Rayner by Keith A. Vogt |
| 3 | 05/20/2026 | ADMIN CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2 | 05/20/2026 | SCHEDULES Schedule A to Complaint 1 by Catherine Frances Rayner |
| 1 | 05/20/2026 | COMPLAINT COMPLAINT filed by Catherine Frances Rayner ; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25146492. 1 attachment |