墨婷跨境
MOT CROSS-BORDER
微信号: Mooting2018
墨婷跨境
MOT CROSS-BORDER
| 编号 | 日期 | 案件进程 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-07-28 | COMPLAINT filed by CosLove Inc. ; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25442639. |
| 2 | 2026-07-28 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 3 | 2026-07-28 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff CosLove Inc. by Shaoyi Che |
| 4 | 2026-07-28 | MOTION by Plaintiff CosLove Inc. for Leave to File Under Seal |
| 5 | 2026-07-28 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff CosLove Inc. Schedule A regarding complaint 1 |
| 6 | 2026-07-28 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by CosLove Inc. |
| 7 | 2026-07-28 | Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by CosLove Inc. |
| — | 2026-07-28 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). |
| — | 2026-07-28 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 8 | 2026-07-29 | MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 9 | 2026-07-29 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials |
| 10 | 2026-07-30 | AMENDED complaint by CosLove Inc. against KDTM DRESS and terminating The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations identified on Schedule A |
| 11 | 2026-07-31 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for leave to file its Schedule A and other materials identifying Defendants under seal 4. Plaintiff has now filed an amended complaint with one Defendant, thus terminating all others. Accordingly, the motion to seal 4 is terminated as moot. Mailed notice. |
| 12 | 2026-07-31 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 9/14/2026, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report. Plaintiff must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the defendant(s) has not been served with process by that date, plaintiff's counsel is instructed to file an individual status report indicating the status of service of process by the same deadline. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Any nongovernmental corporate party that qualifies under the Rules is reminded of the requirement to file a disclosure statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1/N.D. Ill. Local Rule 3.2. Mailed notice. |
| 14 | 2026-09-15 | MOTION by Plaintiff CosLove Inc. for Electronic Service and Expedited Discovery |
| 15 | 2026-09-16 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court grants Plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery [14]. Specifically, the Court grants Plaintiff's request for electronic discovery related to the identities and locations of Defendant. For the reasons stated in the motion, the Court also grants Plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) [14]. Plaintiff attached a declaration discussing its efforts to ascertain a physical address for service through various searches and investigations. Plaintiff was ultimately unable to ascertain an address for service. Accordingly, the Court finds Plaintiff expended reasonably diligent efforts to ascertain an address for service. See, e.g., Hallmark Licensing, LLC v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified in Schedule "A", 24-cv-00112 Dkt. 70 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 31, 2025). Because the address for service is not known, the Hague Convention does not apply. See Kangol LLC v. Hangzhou Chuanyue Silk Imp. & Exp. Co., 177 F.4th 793, 799 (7th Cir. 2026) ("the Convention does not permit service by email in China"). Mailed notice. |