墨婷跨境
MOT CROSS-BORDER
微信号: Mooting2018
墨婷跨境
MOT CROSS-BORDER
| 编号 | 日期 | 案件进程 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-03-31 | ***Sealed*** ORDER, Case sealed. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 03/28/2026) |
| — | 2026-03-31 | Magistrate Judge Gary Stein is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. |
| 2 | 2026-03-31 | SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. |
| 3 | 2026-04-03 | SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault. |
| — | 2026-04-24 | Case Designated ECF. |
| 4 | 2026-04-24 | UNSEALING ORDER: On Plaintiffs' April 24, 2026 application, this case is hereby UNSEALED. Plaintiffs shall ensure that unredacted versions of all documents filed to date appear on the public docket by May 1, 2026 whether that is done by filing the documents anew or by working with the Clerk's Office (through the ECF Help Desk). So ordered. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/24/2026) |
| 5 | 2026-04-24 | CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. ***Previously filed under seal in envelope #2, and unsealed by document #4 ***. |
| 6 | 2026-04-24 | COMPLAINT: |
| 6 | 2026-04-24 | Exhibit A |
| 6 | 2026-04-24 | Exhibit B |
| 6 | 2026-04-24 | Exhibit C |
| 6 | 2026-04-24 | Exhibit D |
| 6 | 2026-04-24 | Exhibit E |
| 6 | 2026-04-24 | Exhibit F |
| 6 | 2026-04-24 | (Exhibit G). ***Previously filed under seal in envelope #2, and unsealed by document #4 ***. (js) |
| 7 | 2026-04-24 | AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1116, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following trademark(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). ***Previously filed under seal in envelope #2, and unsealed by document #4 ***. |
| 8 | 2026-04-24 | AO 121 FORM COPYRIGHT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 17 U.S.C. 508, the Register of Copyrights is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following copyright(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Form e-mailed to Register of Copyrights. ***Previously filed under seal in envelope #2, and unsealed by document #4 ***. |
| 9 | 2026-04-24 | PROPOSED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Document filed by Intellectus Dominus LLC, Maxl LLC., Triphene LLC. ***Previously filed under seal in envelope #2, and unsealed by document #4 ***.(js) Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. |
| 10 | 2026-04-24 | SUMMONS ISSUED: ***Previously filed under seal in envelope #3, and unsealed by document #4 ***. |
| 11 | 2026-04-28 | NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by He Cheng on behalf of FENGRUISHOP, kangxinshop, NEIXUAN. |
| 12 | 2026-04-28 | ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, in accordance with Rules 64 and 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1117, the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 502, N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 6212, and the Court's inherent equitable power to issue provisional remedies ancillary to its authority to provide final equitable relief, no prior application having been granted, and pending the hearing on the Order to Show Cause or further order of the Court that for the next twenty-eight (28)* days from the date of this order, and for any further period as may be provided by Order of this Court : Defendants, their officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them are temporarily restrained and enjoined from: a. Manufacturing, importing, advertising, promoting, offering to sell, selling, distributing, or transferring products that directly or indirectly infringe upon the MAXL Mark, the MAXL ONE Mark, the TRIPHENE Mark, the MAXL ONE Trade Dress, or the MAXL ONE Copyright; Enabling, facilitating, permitting, assisting, soliciting, encouraging or inducing others to manufacture, import, advertise, promote, offer to sell, sell, distribute, or transfer products which directly or indirectly infringe upon the MAXL Mark, the MAXL ONE Mark, the TRIPHENE Mark, the MAXL ONE Trade Dress, or the MAXL ONE Copyright, or directly or indirectly imply a false endorsement or promotion of Defendants' Infringing Products by Plaintiffs or otherwise falsely suggest an affiliation between Defendants and Plaintiffs and as further set forth in this Order; Defendants, their officers, directors, agents, servants, representatives, employees, successors, and assigns, and all those acting in concert or in participation with any of them, as well as any third-party financial institutions, payment processors, banks, escrow services, money transmitters, web hosts, registrars, marketplace platforms, or social media platforms that are providing services for any of the Defendants, including but not limited to AliExpress.com, eBay.com, Walmart.com, Alibaba.com, Amazon.com, TikTok.com, Shein.com, Shopify, AliPay, PayPal, Payoneer, Ping Pong, Coinbase, Stripe, Klarna, Apple Pay, Venmo, Google Pay, Google Sites, Meta, and their related companies and affiliates (together, the "Third Party Providers"), shall, upon receiving actual notice of this Temporary Restraining Order, immediately: a. Remove, disable, or cause the removal or disabling of all listings, storefronts, and other online content for the Infringing Products from all websites, marketplaces, platforms, and domains within Defendants and/or the Third Party Providers' possession, custody, or control, and cease providing services to Defendants for the same; b. Remove, disable, and cease displaying any advertisements used by or associated with Defendants on connection with the promotion, sale, or distribution of the Infringing Products, and cease providing services to Defendants for the same and as further set forth in this Order; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall post security in the amount of $25,000 by corporate surety bond, cash, credit card, or a certified or attorney's check. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that after Plaintiffs' counsel has received confirmation regarding the funds restrained as directed herein and expedited discovery from same as described below, Plaintiffs shall serve copies of this Order, the Complaint, and Plaintiffs' ex parte application (together with all supporting declarations and other documents) on Defendants via the corresponding email addresses and/or online contact form or other means of electronic contact associated with their Online Storefronts, or by providing a copy of this Order by e-mail to the Third Party Provider hosting the Online Marketplace. Plaintiffs shall promptly file proof of such service. Pursuant to Article 15 of the Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, this electronic service is authorized for the purposes of the TRO only. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to issue a single original summons directed to all Defendants as listed in Schedule A To The Complaint that shall apply to all Defendants. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion for leave to take expedited discoveryprior to a Rule 26(f) conference is GRANTED as follows: Good cause having been shown, within five (5) days after service of this Order, any Third-Party Providers providing services to any Defendants shall provide the following information to Plaintiffs' counsel (to the extent such information is in the Third-Party Providers' possession, custody, or control): a. The identity and location of the Defendants, including all known aliases, physical addresses, associated email addresses, and other contact information; b. Any user accounts, online marketplace websites, online storefronts, product listings, seller IDs, product IDs, and/or domains affiliated with Defendants that have not been identified in Schedule A to the Complaint and as further set forth in this Order; Defendants shall preserve and not alter, delete, destroy, conceal, or otherwise dispose of any documents, electronically stored information, tangible things, or data relating to the manufacture, marketing, advertising, sale, offer for sale, importation, distribution, inventory, customers, revenues, costs, and profits associated with the Infringing Products, including all communications with suppliers, customers, payment processors, and marketplaces. Defendants are hereby ORDERED to show cause before this Court in a teleconference on April 28, 2026 at 3:00 p.m., why a preliminary injunction, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a), should not issue. The conference will be held remotely by telephone in accordance with Rule 3.B of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases, available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jesse-m-furman. The parties should join the conference by calling the Court's dedicated conference line at (855) 244-8681 and using access code 2303 019 3884, followed by the pound (#) key. When prompted for an attendee ID number, press the pound (#) key again. Counsel should review and comply with the rules regarding teleconferences in the Court's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases, including Rule 3(B)(i), which requires the parties, no later than 24 hours before the conference, to send a joint email to the Court with the names and honorifics (e.g., Mr., Ms., Dr., etc.) of counsel who may speak during the teleconference and the telephone numbers from which counsel expect to join the call. It is further ORDERED that opposing papers, if any, shall be filed electronically with the Court on or before April 21, 2026. By the same date, Plaintiff shall file a proposed preliminary injunction. Plaintiff shall file any reply in support of the preliminary injunction no later than April 24, 2026. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants are hereby given notice that failure to appear at the show cause hearing scheduled above may result in the imposition of a preliminary injunction against them pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65, which may take effect immediately upon the expiration of this Order, and may extend throughout the length of the litigation under the same terms and conditions set forth in this Order. Plaintiff shall file a letter regarding the continuing need for sealing when (1) there is no longer a need to keep the matter under seal or (2) within fourteen days, whichever is earlier. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/1/26) |
| — | 2026-04-28 | Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers). Transmitted re: 12 Order to Show Cause, to the Finance Unit (Cashiers) for case processing. |
| 13 | 2026-04-28 | ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from Danielle C. Zolot dated 4/15/26 re: submitting that there is an ongoing need to keep this Action under seal. ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiffs shall file an update regarding the need to keep this case under seal by the earlier of April 21, 2026 or once Plaintiffs receive confirmation that all Defendants' accounts have been restrained. Once the Court receives that update and unseals the case, the Court will adjust the deadlines for any opposition to the preliminary injunction motion and the hearing as appropriate. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/15/26) |
| 14 | 2026-04-28 | ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from Danielle C. Zolot dated 4/21/26 re: submit that there is an ongoing need to keep this Action under seal. ENDORSEMENT: The Court finds, pursuant to Rule 65(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that good cause exists to extend the temporary restraining order in this case to May 6, 2026 because some Defendants' accounts have not yet been restrained and service prior to restraining their accounts could permit those Defendants to evade judgment. The deadline for Defendants' opposing papers is accordingly EXTENDED to April 28, 2026. By the same date, Plaintiff shall file a proposed preliminary injunction. Plaintiff shall file any reply in support of the preliminary injunction no later than May 1, 2026. The teleconference currently scheduled for April 28, 2026 at 3:00 p.m. is hereby ADJOURNED to May 5, 2026 at 3:00 p.m. Plaintiffs shall file an update regarding the need to keep this case under seal by the earlier of April 28, 2026 or once Plaintiffs receive confirmation that all Defendants' accounts have been restrained. SO ORDERED., (Telephone Conference set for 5/5/2026 at 03:00 PM before Judge Jesse M. Furman.) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/21/26) |
| 15 | 2026-04-28 | RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Other Affiliate Libertas Holding, LLC, Other Affiliate Awesomessauce, LLC for Intellectus Dominus LLC, Maxl LLC., Triphene LLC. Document filed by Intellectus Dominus LLC, Maxl LLC., Triphene LLC. |
| 16 | 2026-04-28 | DECLARATION of Cassidy Moon re: 12 Order to Show Cause. Document filed by Intellectus Dominus LLC, Maxl LLC., Triphene LLC. |
| 17 | 2026-04-28 | PROPOSED ORDER. Document filed by Intellectus Dominus LLC, Maxl LLC., Triphene LLC. Related Document Number: 12. Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. |
| 18 | 2026-04-28 | LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply [Unopposed] addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from He Cheng dated 4/28/2026. Document filed by FENGRUISHOP, NEIXUAN, kangxinshop. |
| — | 2026-04-29 | ***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING PROPOSED ORDER. Document No. 17 Proposed Order was reviewed and approved as to form. |
| 19 | 2026-04-29 | ORDER granting 18 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Application GRANTED. Defendants FENGRUISHOP, kangxinshop, and NEIXUAN's deadline for opposing papers is hereby EXTENDED, nunc pro tunc, to May 12, 2026. Plaintiffs' deadline to file a reply in support of the preliminary injunction is accordingly EXTENDED to May 15, 2026. The teleconference currently scheduled for May 5, 2026 at 3:00 p.m. is hereby ADJOURNED to May 20, 2026 at 4:00 p.m. Based on these extensions, the Court finds, pursuant to Rule 65(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that good cause exists to extend the temporary restraining order in this case to May 21, 2026. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 18. SO ORDERED. Responses due by 5/12/2026 Replies due by 5/15/2026. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/29/2026) |
| — | 2026-04-29 | Set/Reset Hearings: Telephone Conference set for 5/20/2026 at 04:00 PM before Judge Jesse M. Furman. |
| — | 2026-05-01 | ***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number 20 Civil Cover Sheet. The document was incorrectly filed in this case. |
| 20 | 2026-04-24 | MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, EXPEDITED DISCOVERY ORDER, AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION: ***Previously filed under seal in envelope #2, and unsealed by document # 4 ***. |
| 21 | 2026-04-24 | DECLARATION of ALEX BOYCHUCK: ***Previously filed under seal in envelope #2, and unsealed by document # 4 ***. |
| 22 | 2026-04-24 | DECLARATION of MICHAEL LAHATTE: ***Previously filed under seal in envelope #2, and unsealed by document # 4 ***. |
| 23 | 2026-04-24 | DECLARATION of FRANCESCA WITZBURG: ***Previously filed under seal in envelope #2 and unsealed by document # 4 ***. |
| 24 | 2026-05-12 | NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Cure Bloom Studio. Document filed by Maxl LLC., Intellectus Dominus LLC, Triphene LLC. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). |
| — | 2026-05-13 | ***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. 24 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Jesse M. Furman for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. |
| 25 | 2026-05-13 | PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs MAXL, LLC, Intellectus Dominus, LLC, and Triphene LLC hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice as to all claims and causes of action against Defendant Cure Bloom Studio, with each party bearing that party's own attorney's fees and costs. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Cure Bloom Studio as a defendant in this case. SO ORDERED. Cure Bloom Studio (E-Commerce Platform Walmart) terminated. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 5/13/2026) |
| 26 | 2026-05-14 | NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) FENGRUISHOP, NEIXUAN, kangxinshop. Document filed by Maxl LLC., Intellectus Dominus LLC, Triphene LLC. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers). |
| — | 2026-05-15 | ***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. 26 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was reviewed and referred to Judge Jesse M. Furman for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. |
| 27 | 2026-05-15 | PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs MAXL, LLC, Intellectus Dominus, LLC, and Triphene LLC hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed with prejudice as to all claims and causes of action against Defendants FENGRUISHOP, kangxinshop, and NEIXUAN, with each party bearing that party's own attorney's fees and costs. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate FENGRUISHOP, kangxinshop, and NEIXUAN as defendants in this case. SO ORDERED kangxinshop (E-Commerce Platform Walmart), FENGRUISHOP (E-Commerce Platform Walmart) and NEIXUAN (E-Commerce Platform Walmart) terminated. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 5/15/2026) |
| 28 | 2026-05-20 | NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, counsel for all parties shall appear for an initial pretrial conference with the Court on November 17, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. The conference will be held remotely by telephone in accordance with Paragraph 3.B of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases. The parties should join the conference by calling the Court's dedicated conference line at (855) 244-8681 and using access code 2303 019 3884, followed by the pound (#) key. When prompted for an attendee ID number, press the pound (#) key again. All counsel must also familiarize themselves with the Court's Individual Rules, which are available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jesse-m-furman. Absent leave of Court obtained by letter-motion filed before the conference, all pretrial conferences must be attended by the attorney who will serve as principal trial counsel. Counsel are directed to confer with each other prior to the conference regarding settlement and each of the other subjects to be considered at a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 conference. Additionally, in accordance with Paragraph 3.D of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices, the parties are hereby ORDERED to file on ECF a joint letter, described below, as well as a proposed Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order attached as an exhibit to the joint letter, no later than Thursday of the week prior to the initial pretrial conference. The parties shall use this Court's form Proposed Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order, which is also available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jesse-m-furman. Any open legal issues can be addressed at the conference.(And as further set forth herein.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 5/20/2026) Initial Conference set for 11/17/2026 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesse M. Furman. |
| 29 | 2026-05-20 | PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION: WHEREAS, Plaintiffs MAXL, LLC ("MAXL"), Intellectus Dominus, LLC ("Intellectus Dominus"), and Triphene LLC ("Triphene") (collectively, "Plaintiffs") having moved ex parte on March 31, 2026 against the fourteen (14) Defendants listed on Schedule A to the Complaint (collectively, "Defendants"), using at least the online marketplace accounts identified in the Complaint (the "Online Storefronts"), for (1) a temporary restraining order enjoining Defendants from infringing upon Plaintiffs' trademarks and copyrighted work; (2) a temporary restraining order preventing asset transfer; (3) an expedited discovery order; and (4) an order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue (collectively, the "Application"); WHEREAS, on April 1, 2026, the Court entered an Order granting Plaintiffs' Application ("TRO") which ordered Defendants to appear on April 28, 2026 at 3:00 p.m. to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue (the "Hearing"); WHEREAS, on April 24, 2026, pursuant to the TRO, Plaintiffs served the Complaint, TRO, and all papers filed in support of the Application on each and every Defendant; WHEREAS, the Court scheduled the Hearing for May 20, 2026 4:00 p.m. The injunctive relief and asset restraint previously granted in the TRO shall remain in place through the pendency of this litigation, and issuing this Order is warranted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 and Section 34 of the Lanham Act. a. Accordingly, Defendants, their officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons acting in concert or participation with them are hereby restrained and enjoined from engaging in any of the following acts or omissions pending the final hearing and determination of this action or until further order of the Court: i. Manufacturing, importing, advertising, promoting, offering to sell, selling, distributing, or transferring products that directly or indirectly infringe upon the MAXL Mark, the MAXL ONE Mark, the TRIPHENE Mark, the MAXL ONE Trade Dress, or the MAXL ONE Copyright; ii. Enabling, facilitating, permitting, assisting, soliciting, encouraging or inducing others to manufacture, import, advertise, promote, offer to sell, sell, distribute, or transfer products which directly or indirectly infringe upon the MAXL Mark, the MAXL ONE Mark, the TRIPHENE Mark, the MAXL ONE Trade Dress, or the MAXL ONE Copyright, or directly or indirectly imply a false endorsement or promotion of Defendants' Infringing Products by Plaintiffs or otherwise falsely suggest an affiliation between Defendants and Plaintiffs; iii. Passing off, inducing, or enabling others to sell or pass off any product as a genuine MAXL-branded product that is not, in fact, Plaintiffs' MAXL-branded product and/or not produced under the authorization, control, or supervision of Plaintiffs and approved by Plaintiffs for sale under the MAXL Mark, the MAXLONE Mark, the TRIPHENE Mark, or the MAXL ONE Trade Dress; iv. Committing any acts calculated to cause consumers to believe that Defendants' Infringing Products are those sold under the authorization, control or supervision of Plaintiffs, or are sponsored, approved, or endorsed by, or otherwise connected with, Plaintiffs; v. Using the MAXL Mark, the MAXL ONE Mark, or the TRIPHENE Mark as metatags, on any webpage (including the title of any web page), in any advertising links to other websites, from search engines' databases or cache memory, or any other form of use of such terms that are visible to a computer user or serves to direct computer searches to Online Storefronts and/or product listings registered, owned, or operated by any Defendant on any e-commerce platform; and vi. Operating and/or hosting websites and/or any other web presence or online storefront registered or operated by Defendants that are involved with the distribution, marketing, advertising, offering for sale, or sale of any product embodying or bearing the MAXL Mark, the MAXL ONE Mark, the TRIPHENE Mark, the MAXL ONE Trade Dress, or the MAXL ONE Copyright. As further set forth in this Order, As sufficient cause has been shown, Plaintiffs shall serve copies of this Order on Defendants via the corresponding email addresses and/or online contact form or other means of electronic contact associated with their Online Storefronts, or by providing a copy of this Order by e-mail to the Third Party Provider hosting the Online Storefront, as ordered in the TRO, and such means shall be deemed as effective as to Defendants and Third Party Providers through the pendency of this action. Pursuant to Article 15 of the Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, this electronic service is authorized for the purposes of the PI only. Defendants are hereby given notice that they may be deemed to have actual notice of the terms of this Order. Any act in violation of this Order by Defendants or any one of them, or by any persons in active concert or participation with Defendants who have actual notice of this Order, may be considered and prosecuted as in contempt of this Court. The $25,000.00 bond posted by Plaintiffs shall remain with the Court until a final disposition of this case or until this Order is terminated. This Order shall remain in effect during the pendency of this action, or until further order of the Court. Any Defendants that are subject to this Order may appear and move to dissolve or modify the Order on two (2) days' notice to Plaintiffs or on shorter notice as set by the Court. Plaintiffs shall file a status letter with updates and proposed next steps no later than July 20, 2026 and every sixty days thereafter until the Court orders otherwise. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 5/20/2026) (ar) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing. |
| — | 2026-05-20 | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jesse M. Furman: PI Hearing held, via teleconference, on 5/20/2026. Danielle Zolot and Ananya Muralidhar present for Plaintiff. Nobody present for Defendants. Court reporter present. |
| 30 | 2026-05-29 | DECLARATION of Cassidy Moon re: 28 Order for Initial Pretrial Conference. Document filed by Intellectus Dominus LLC, Maxl LLC., Triphene LLC. |
| 31 | 2026-07-20 | LETTER addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from Francesca Witzburg dated July 20, 2026 re: Status Report. Document filed by Intellectus Dominus LLC, Maxl LLC., Triphene LLC. |
| 32 | 2026-07-21 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: [31] Letter filed by Intellectus Dominus LLC, Triphene LLC., Maxl LLC. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 7/21/2026) |