墨婷跨境
MOT CROSS-BORDER
微信号: Mooting2018
墨婷跨境
MOT CROSS-BORDER
| 编号 | 日期 | 案件进程 |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 2026-07-07 | ELECTRONIC ORDER: N.D. Tex. Civ. R. 83.10(a) requires the appearance of local counsel where counsel of record for a party does not reside in this district. Accordingly, no later than July 21, 2026, the plaintiffs shall file the entry of appearance of local counsel satisfying the requirements of Local Rule 83.10(a). Failure to do so will result in dismissal without prejudice of this case without further notice. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 7/7/2026) (chmb) |
| 9 | 2026-07-07 | Order Striking/Unfiling Pleading [4] Notice of Attorney Appearance, [7] Notice of Attorney Appearance due to the following deficiency: S.D. Tex. Local Rule 83.2 (cited in the Notice and Amended Notice) is inapplicable in the Northern District of Texas. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 7/7/2026) |
| 11 | 2026-07-08 | ORDER: It is ORDERED that the plaintiffs file an amended motion for withdrawal and substitution of counsel in accordance with the rules of this court no later than July 15, 2026. It is further ORDERED that counsel for the plaintiffs must review the en banc decision of this court in Dondi Properties Corporation v. Commerce Savings and Loan Association, 121 F.R.D. 284 (N.D. Tex. 1988) (per curiam) (standards of litigation conduct), the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Civil Rules. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 7/8/2026) |
| 13 | 2026-07-08 | ORDER granting [12] Amended Motion to Substitute Attorney. It is therefore, ORDERED that Kristabella Manzanilla is withdrawn as counsel for the plaintiffs from this matter, and that Julio Martinez of MSPG Law Group, P.A., is hereby substituted as attorney in charge for the plaintiffs in this cause. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 7/8/2026) |
| 15 | 2026-07-23 | Order to Show Cause. No later than July 30, 2026, plaintiffs' counsel is ORDERED to: show cause why the plaintiffs failed to address the court's order of July 7, 2026 (docket entry 6); state his residence and/or location of his principal office in accordance with N.D. TEX. CIV. R. 83.10(a); if plaintiffs' counsel resides in this district and/or his principal office is located in this district, show cause why counsel failed to comply with N.D. Tex. Civ. R. 83.13(b); and certify that counsel reviewed the en banc decision of this court in Dondi Properties Corporation v. Commerce Savings and Loan Association, 121 F.R.D. 284 (N.D. Tex. 1988) (per curiam) (standards of litigation conduct), the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Civil Rules, see docket entry [11], and will comply will all orders of this court. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 7/23/2026) (rekc) |
| 17 | 2026-07-31 | ELECTRONIC ORDER: Before the court is [16] Plaintiff's [sic] Response to Court's Order Regarding Local Civil Rule 83.10(a). The court construes the response as a motion for leave to proceed without designation of local counsel. So construed, the motion is GRANTED. Accordingly, the plaintiffs may proceed without designation of local counsel in this matter. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 7/31/2026) (chmb) |
| 18 | 2026-07-31 | STATUS REPORT ORDER: Status Report due by 9/1/2026. (Ordered by Senior Judge A. Joe Fish on 7/31/2026) (chmb) |