TRO 案件

Christian Dior S.A.|1:26-cv-10259

案件基础信息

完整案号
1:26-cv-10259
法院
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
立案日
2026-08-25
原告
Christian Dior S.A.
原告律所
Kossof IPR
权利类型
商标
案件状态
公开记录持续核验中
最后核验时间
2026-09-05 14:23:42

案件进程

编号日期案件进程
12026-08-25COMPLAINT filed by Christian Dior S.A.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25574460.
22026-08-25SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Christian Dior S.A. Schedule A
32026-08-25CIVIL Cover Sheet
42026-08-25ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Christian Dior S.A. by Paul Joseph Kossof
62026-08-25NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Christian Dior S.A.
72026-08-25Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Christian Dior S.A.
82026-08-25Trademark Report by Christian Dior S.A.
92026-08-25DECLARATION of Paul Kossof
102026-08-25MOTION by Plaintiff Christian Dior S.A. to seal (1) Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Dilpreet Aujla Regarding Investigative Efforts to Ascertain Defendants Physical Addresses and (2) Plaintiff's Memorandum Regarding Joinder and Personal Jurisdiction.
112026-08-26DECLARATION of Nicolas Lambert
122026-08-26SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Christian Dior S.A. Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Nicolas Lambert
132026-08-26MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. Plaintiff has filed a complaint alleging infringement by 8 defendants. This case follows a pattern common to "Schedule A" cases where plaintiffs allege that defendants employ similar methods and "work in active concert" to infringe plaintiffs' intellectual property. But experience has shown that not all defendants named in a Schedule A case work together. More importantly, experience has shown that joinder under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 and 20 is rarely appropriate in Schedule A cases. Accordingly, the Court raises the propriety of joinder and requires the plaintiff to file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder at least 7 days before the filing of the motion for temporary restraining order. Alternatively, by the same date, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint and amended Schedule A reducing the number of defendants. However, if Plaintiff names multiple defendants, Plaintiff must show that joinder of those defendants is proper. The Court directs Plaintiff to this Court's standing order in Schedule A cases regarding joinder on the Court's website. The Seventh Circuit has clarified that establishing personal jurisdiction in Schedule A cases requires that plaintiffs show evidence, for each defendant, of actual sales to Illinois customers and of actual products shipped to Illinois. Liu v. Monthly, No. 25-2074, 2026 WL 880018, at *23 (7th Cir. Mar. 31, 2026). Mere evidence of being willing to ship to Illinois customers is insufficient. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint if additional evidence is needed to establish personal jurisdiction over each Defendant under this standard. Finally, the Seventh Circuit has also ruled that the Hague Convention does not permit service by email to defendants in China. Kangol LLC v. Hangzhou Chuanyue Silk Imp. & Exp. Co., 2026 WL 1502198, at *5 (7th Cir. May 29, 2026). If Plaintiff intends to move to effectuate service via email on defendants located in China, then Plaintiff's motion will need to provide individualized arguments for each such Defendant that the Hague Convention does not apply, supported by details of the good faith effort Plaintiff has taken to ascertain the address of each such defendant. Mailed notice.
142026-08-26MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA
152026-08-26MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials
182026-09-09MOTION by Plaintiff Christian Dior S.A.for electronic service of process.
192026-09-09MOTION by Plaintiff Christian Dior S.A. for temporary restraining order
232026-09-30MOTION by Plaintiff Christian Dior S.A. to seal Test Purchase Evidence.
252026-09-30MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Motion hearing held on 9/30/2026. Plaintiff's motions for leave to file under seal [5] and [10] are granted. Plaintiff's motion for electronic service [18] and motion for temporary restraining order [19] are taken under advisement. An in-person status hearing is set for 10/14/2026 at 9:30 AM. Mailed notice.
272026-10-05MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's supplemental evidence of personal jurisdiction [26] and finds that personal jurisdiction has been established for each Defendant in this case. The motion to seal the supplement [23] is granted. The Court also grants the pending motions for a temporary restraining order [19] and for electronic service of process [18], for the reasons stated on the record during the hearing on 9/30/2026. Enter Order. Mailed notice.
282026-10-05SEALED ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 10/5/2026. Mailed notice.
292026-10-08MOTION by Plaintiff Christian Dior S.A.for extension of the temporary restraining order.

免费评估

如您已收到与本案件号相关的 TRO 邮件,可花 30 秒填写评估表,快速获取和解或应诉路径,并初步了解预计处理成本。

立即评估

案件咨询

如你已经收到平台冻结、律师函、TRO 通知或想进一步判断案件影响,可以直接联系我们团队做下一步咨询。

立即咨询

诉状与涉案权利

文件基于公开法院记录整理,仅供风险识别参考,不构成法律意见。

文件待补充

正在加载已核验信息…

该原告/品牌方起诉的其他案件

正在加载相关案件…

TRO查询 最新资讯 关于我们 联系我们