墨婷跨境
MOT CROSS-BORDER
微信号: Mooting2018
墨婷跨境
MOT CROSS-BORDER
| 编号 | 日期 | 案件进程 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-08-26 | COMPLAINT filed by NextClimb Investments LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25577795. |
| 2 | 2026-08-26 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 3 | 2026-08-26 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff NextClimb Investments LLC by Shaoyi Che |
| 4 | 2026-08-26 | MOTION by Plaintiff NextClimb Investments LLC for Leave to File Under Seal |
| 5 | 2026-08-26 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by NextClimb Investments LLC |
| 6 | 2026-08-26 | Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by NextClimb Investments LLC |
| — | 2026-08-26 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). |
| — | 2026-08-26 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 8 | 2026-08-26 | NOTICE of Motion by Shaoyi Che for presentment of motion for miscellaneous relief 4 before Honorable Manish S. Shah on 9/8/2026 at 09:45 AM. |
| 9 | 2026-08-27 | MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. |
| 10 | 2026-08-27 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: The motion for leave to file under seal 4 is denied and no appearance on 9/8/26 is necessary. The court does not agree that plaintiff's boilerplate and general fears of document destruction and movement of assets outweighs the public right to access court records. The court is unlikely to grant an asset restraint and generally believes public notice and adversarial presentation is necessary to grant such extraordinary relief. Finally, sealing voluminous filings that would likely accompany a case naming over 80 defendants imposes too great a burden on the court. The clerk shall immediately unseal 7. Notices Mailed. |