TRO 案件

Olga Almukhametova|26-cv-1835

案件基础信息

完整案号
26-cv-1835
法院
United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
立案日
2026-09-02
原告
Olga Almukhametova
原告律所
Ference
权利类型
版权
案件状态
公开记录持续核验中
最后核验时间
2026-09-04 14:52:00

案件进程

编号日期案件进程
12026-09-02COMPLAINT against SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $405, receipt number APAWDC-9849764), filed by OLGA ALMUKHAMETOVA.
42026-09-02MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, MOTION Order Restraining Assets and Merchant Storefronts, MOTION to Expedite, MOTION for Order to Show Cause by OLGA ALMUKHAMETOVA.
52026-09-02MOTION for Leave to File Documents Under Seal by OLGA ALMUKHAMETOVA.
72026-09-03ORDER denying [5] Motion for Leave to File Documents under Seal without prejudice, allowing Plaintiff to refile Motion with sufficient particularity as to good cause for proceeding under seal. At present, the Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to show good cause for proceeding under seal because it has not stated, with any particularity, that the Defendants in this particular case have improperly transferred assets to avoid judgment or have even in prior instances engaged in such improper conduct. Generalized allegations about counterfeiter Defendants do not suffice. Plaintiff may refile its Motion to File under Seal with sufficient particularity; for example, Plaintiff may show that these particular Defendants have a track record of moving assets or changing names or addresses, or have engaged in other conduct to avoid seizure of any ill-gotten gains. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 9/3/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter.
82026-09-03ORDER denying [4] Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Order Restraining Assets and Merchant Storefronts, Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should not Issue, and Order Authorizing Expedited Discovery without prejudice to the filing of a renewed motion once the "sealing" issue has been resolved. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 9/3/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter.
92026-09-03ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSING. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk mark the above-captioned case closed; that nothing contained in this order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of this action; and that, should further proceedings therein become necessary or desirable, any party may initiate the same in the same manner as if this order had not been entered. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 9/3/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter.

免费评估

如您已收到与本案件号相关的 TRO 邮件,可花 30 秒填写评估表,快速获取和解或应诉路径,并初步了解预计处理成本。

立即评估

案件咨询

如你已经收到平台冻结、律师函、TRO 通知或想进一步判断案件影响,可以直接联系我们团队做下一步咨询。

立即咨询

诉状与涉案权利

文件基于公开法院记录整理,仅供风险识别参考,不构成法律意见。

文件待补充

正在加载已核验信息…

该原告/品牌方起诉的其他案件

正在加载相关案件…

TRO查询 最新资讯 关于我们 联系我们