TRO 案件

Paddington & Company Ltd.|1:26-cv-10808

案件基础信息

完整案号
1:26-cv-10808
法院
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
立案日
2026-09-08
原告
Paddington & Company Ltd.
原告律所
TME
权利类型
商标
案件状态
公开记录持续核验中
最后核验时间
2026-09-09 10:14:52

案件进程

编号日期案件进程
12026-09-08COMPLAINT filed by Paddington & Company Ltd.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25629844.
52026-09-08CIVIL Cover Sheet
62026-09-08NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Paddington & Company Ltd.
72026-09-08Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Paddington & Company Ltd.
82026-09-08ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Paddington & Company Ltd. by Martin Francis Trainor
92026-09-08ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Paddington & Company Ltd. by Alexander Whang
102026-09-08ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Paddington & Company Ltd. by Victor Benjamin Chahin, Jr
—2026-09-08CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).
—2026-09-08CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
112026-09-09MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA
122026-09-09MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials
132026-09-10MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion [4] to proceed under seal is denied. Proceeding under seal is extraordinary. Plaintiff has not identified circumstances warranting such extraordinary relief. See generally Eicher Motors Ltd. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 25-CV-02937, 2025 WL 2299593 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 8, 2025). Initial status hearing is set for 10/8/2026 at 9:00 a.m. in person in Courtroom 2325. By 10/1/2026, the parties shall file an Initial Joint Status Report. Mailed notice.
142026-09-11MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: 1. By 9/16/26, plaintiff must refile publicly all sealed documents. See [13]. 2. By 10/1/2026, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed or severed for improper joinder. Plaintiff is advised of the following: First, "[o]n motion or on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party." Fed. R. Civ. P. 21(a). Second, sua sponte review of the propriety of joinder in Schedule A cases is a regular practice of courts in this district because plaintiffs "routinely file these multi-defendant cases. using cookie-cutter complaints that allege in a conclusory manner that 'on information and belief' each infringing defendant is inter-connected with the others." Viking Arm AS v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 24-cv-1566, 2024 WL 2953105, at *1 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024). Third, "[c]ourts generally find that claims against different defendants arose out of the same transaction or occurrence only if there is a logical relationship between the separate causes of action." Estee Lauder Cosms. Ltd. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", 334 F.R.D. 182, 185 (N.D. Ill. 2020) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). Fourth, courts have held that "to be part of the same transaction requires shared, overlapping facts that give rise to each cause of action, and not just distinct, albeit coincidentally identical, facts." Id. (quoting In re EMC Corp., 677 F.3d 1351, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2012)). Fifth, courts have held that the allegation that multiple defendants have infringed on the same copyright or trademark in the same way "does not create the substantial evidentiary overlap required to find a similar transaction or occurrence." Roadget Bus. Pte. Ltd. v. Schedule A Defs., No. 23-cv-17036, 2024 WL 1858592, at *6 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 29, 2024) (collecting cases). Finally, courts have held that the allegation that defendants "share unique identifiers, such as design elements and similarities of the unauthorized products offered for sale," is not sufficient to establish joinder. Ilustrata Servicos Design, Ltd. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 21-cv-05993, 2021 WL 5396690, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 18, 2021); Art Ask Agency v. Individuals, Corps., Ltd. Liab. Cos., P'ships, & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 21-cv-06197, 2021 WL 5493226, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 23, 2021). Emailed notice
—2026-09-14NEW PARTIES: pr0metheus-7 added to case caption. Terminating The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
152026-09-14AMENDED complaint by Paddington & Company Ltd. against pr0metheus-7
182026-09-16NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Paddington & Company Ltd. as to a certain defendant
192026-09-16NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Paddington & Company Ltd. as to a certain defendant
202026-09-16MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal, [18]. This dismissal took effect without court intervention. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Waetzig v. Haliburton Energy Servs., 145 S. Ct. 690, 694 (2025). The initial status hearing set for 10/8/2026 is stricken. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice.
212026-09-17MAILED closing Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA

免费评估

如您已收到与本案件号相关的 TRO 邮件,可花 30 秒填写评估表,快速获取和解或应诉路径,并初步了解预计处理成本。

立即评估

案件咨询

如你已经收到平台冻结、律师函、TRO 通知或想进一步判断案件影响,可以直接联系我们团队做下一步咨询。

立即咨询

诉状与涉案权利

文件基于公开法院记录整理,仅供风险识别参考,不构成法律意见。

文件待补充

正在加载已核验信息…

该原告/品牌方起诉的其他案件

正在加载相关案件…

TRO查询 最新资讯 关于我们 联系我们