TRO 案件

Hari Studios|26-cv-10899

案件基础信息

完整案号
26-cv-10899
法院
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
立案日
2026-09-09
原告
Hari Studios
原告律所
Pierson Ferdinand
权利类型
版权
案件状态
公开记录持续核验中
最后核验时间
2026-09-10 09:44:28

案件进程

编号日期案件进程
12026-09-09COMPLAINT filed by Hari Studios; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25636465.
22026-09-09CIVIL Cover Sheet (Quezada Hastings, Sofia)
32026-09-09ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hari Studios by Sofia Quezada Hastings (Quezada Hastings, Sofia)
42026-09-09MOTION by Plaintiff Hari Studios for leave to file certain documents under seal (Quezada Hastings, Sofia)
52026-09-10MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC (bi,)
62026-09-15MOTION by Plaintiff Hari Studios for temporary restraining order
72026-09-15SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Hari Studios Evidence Exhibits
82026-09-15MOTION by Plaintiff Hari Studios for Electronic Service of Process
92026-09-18MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal [5] and ex parte motion for temporary restraining order [7] are granted. Enter Sealed Temporary Restraining Order. Mailed notice
102026-09-18SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 9/18/2026.
112026-09-25MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) [9] is denied without prejudice. The motion relies on authority pre-Kangol LLC v. Hangzhou Chuanyue Silk Imp. & Exp. Co., 177 F.4th 793 (7th Cir. 2026) for the premise that a plaintiff need not attempt Hague service before seeking relief under Rule 4(f)(3). Kangol holds otherwise: where the Convention applies, its methods are exclusive, and it prohibits e-mail service on Defendants in China. The only route to the requested relief is a finding under Article 1 that a Defendant's address is not known following reasonably diligent efforts, and this record does not permit that finding. The supporting declaration [9-2] describes the investigation in general terms and reports its results schedule-wide: addresses "in numerous instances" could not be confirmed, and "many Defendants" lacked verifiable locations, without identifying which Defendants, what addresses were found, or what any search returned. The investigation was also limited to online mapping services, which are insufficient on their own to establish that an address is not known. See Reebok Int'l Ltd., 26 C 10969, Dkt. # 19 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 14, 2026) (Durkin, J.) ("the results of searches using online mapping services (e.g., Google Maps, Baidu Maps, etc.) are insufficient to establish that an address 'is not known' for purposes of jurisdiction under the Hague Convention."); Chrome Hearts LLC, 26 C 7163, at Dkt. # 45 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 18, 2026) (Rowland, J.) ("plugging in a candidate address into Baidu Maps and observing if the search results listed the corresponding Defendant's Seller Alias or business entity name. assumes that each Defendant listed its seller / business name on Baidu Maps."). Any renewed motion must be supported by a declaration made under penalty of perjury detailing the specific, reasonably diligent efforts undertaken and the outcome of each effort, as to each Defendant, and for any Defendant as to whom the investigation returned an identifiable physical location, Plaintiff must explain what steps were taken to rule the address out (for example, courier or investigator confirmation that the premises do not exist, are incomplete or fictitious, or are occupied by an unrelated party, or another similarly reliable method). A conclusory statement that an address could not be verified tells the Court nothing. A status report is due 10/26/2026. Mailed notice
122026-09-29MOTION by Plaintiff Hari Studios for extension of time for Temporary Restraining Order
132026-10-01MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Plaintiff's Motion to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order [13] is granted for the reasons set forth therein. The TRO is extended to 10/16/2026. Enter Order Extending the Temporary Restraining Order. Mailed notice
142026-10-01ORDER Extending the TRO signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 10/1/2026. Mailed notice
152026-10-01SURETY BOND in the amount of $10,000.00 posted by Hari Studios (Document not scanned). (bi,)
162026-10-13MOTION by Plaintiff Hari Studios for preliminary injunction
172026-10-13MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction [17] is taken under advisement. Any opposition to the motion must be submitted by noon on 10/16/2026. Mailed notice
182026-10-16PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 10/16/2026. Mailed notice

免费评估

如您已收到与本案件号相关的 TRO 邮件,可花 30 秒填写评估表,快速获取和解或应诉路径,并初步了解预计处理成本。

立即评估

案件咨询

如你已经收到平台冻结、律师函、TRO 通知或想进一步判断案件影响,可以直接联系我们团队做下一步咨询。

立即咨询

诉状与涉案权利

文件基于公开法院记录整理,仅供风险识别参考,不构成法律意见。

文件待补充

正在加载已核验信息…

该原告/品牌方起诉的其他案件

正在加载相关案件…

TRO查询 最新资讯 关于我们 联系我们