TRO 案件

DreamWorks, LLC and DreamWorks Animation LLC|26-cv-10999

案件基础信息

完整案号
26-cv-10999
法院
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
立案日
2026-09-10
原告
DreamWorks, LLC and DreamWorks Animation LLC
原告律所
GBC
权利类型
商标
案件状态
公开记录持续核验中
最后核验时间
2026-09-11 09:42:15

案件进程

编号日期案件进程
12026-09-10COMPLAINT filed by DreamWorks Animation LLC, DreamWorks, LLC; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25644082.
22026-09-10SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiffs DreamWorks Animation LLC, DreamWorks, LLC Schedule A regarding complaint[1]
32026-09-10SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiffs DreamWorks Animation LLC, DreamWorks, LLC Exhibit 3 - Parts 1-2 regarding complaint[1]
42026-09-10MOTION by Plaintiffs DreamWorks Animation LLC, DreamWorks, LLC for leave to file under seal
52026-09-10CIVIL Cover Sheet
62026-09-10NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by DreamWorks Animation LLC, DreamWorks, LLC
72026-09-10Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by DreamWorks Animation LLC, DreamWorks, LLC
82026-09-10ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs DreamWorks Animation LLC, DreamWorks, LLC by Justin R. Gaudio
92026-09-10ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs DreamWorks Animation LLC, DreamWorks, LLC by Amy Crout Ziegler
102026-09-10ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs DreamWorks Animation LLC, DreamWorks, LLC by Kahlia Roe Halpern
112026-09-10ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs DreamWorks Animation LLC, DreamWorks, LLC by Jennifer Mary Younan
—2026-09-10CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Maria Valdez. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2).
122026-09-11MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. Plaintiff has filed a complaint alleging infringement by 55 defendants. This case follows a pattern common to "Schedule A" cases where plaintiffs allege that defendants employ similar methods and "work in active concert" to infringe plaintiffs' intellectual property. But experience has shown that not all defendants named in a Schedule A case work together. More importantly, experience has shown that joinder under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 and 20 is rarely appropriate in Schedule A cases. Accordingly, the Court raises the propriety of joinder and requires the plaintiff to file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder at least 7 days before the filing of the motion for temporary restraining order. Alternatively, by the same date, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint and amended Schedule A reducing the number of defendants. However, if Plaintiff names multiple defendants, Plaintiff must show that joinder of those defendants is proper. The Court directs Plaintiff to this Court's standing order in Schedule A cases regarding joinder on the Court's website. The Seventh Circuit has clarified that establishing personal jurisdiction in Schedule A cases requires that plaintiffs show evidence, for each defendant, of actual sales to Illinois customers and of actual products shipped to Illinois. Liu v. Monthly, No. 25-2074, 2026 WL 880018, at *23 (7th Cir. Mar. 31, 2026). Mere evidence of being willing to ship to Illinois customers is insufficient. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint if additional evidence is needed to establish personal jurisdiction over each Defendant under this standard. Finally, the Seventh Circuit has also ruled that the Hague Convention does not permit service by email to defendants in China. Kangol LLC v. Hangzhou Chuanyue Silk Imp. & Exp. Co., 2026 WL 1502198, at *5 (7th Cir. May 29, 2026). If Plaintiff intends to move to effectuate service via email on defendants located in China, then Plaintiff's motion will need to provide individualized arguments for each such Defendant that the Hague Convention does not apply, supported by details of the good faith effort Plaintiff has taken to ascertain the address of each such defendant. Mailed notice.
132026-09-11MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA
142026-09-11MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials
152026-09-11AMENDED complaint by DreamWorks Animation LLC, DreamWorks, LLC against mengdastore and terminating The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
162026-09-11Notice of Withdrawal of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal by DreamWorks Animation LLC, DreamWorks, LLC
172026-09-11MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Pursuant to the notice of withdrawal [16], plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal [4] is withdrawn. Mailed notice.
182026-09-18NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by DreamWorks Animation LLC, DreamWorks, LLC as to Defendant mengdastore
192026-09-21MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), this case is dismissed without prejudice. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice.
202026-09-22MAILED Trademark report with certified copy of minute order dated 9/21/26 to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA

免费评估

如您已收到与本案件号相关的 TRO 邮件,可花 30 秒填写评估表,快速获取和解或应诉路径,并初步了解预计处理成本。

立即评估

案件咨询

如你已经收到平台冻结、律师函、TRO 通知或想进一步判断案件影响,可以直接联系我们团队做下一步咨询。

立即咨询

诉状与涉案权利

文件基于公开法院记录整理,仅供风险识别参考,不构成法律意见。

文件待补充

正在加载已核验信息…

该原告/品牌方起诉的其他案件

正在加载相关案件…

TRO查询 最新资讯 关于我们 联系我们