墨婷跨境
MOT CROSS-BORDER
微信号: Mooting2018
墨婷跨境
MOT CROSS-BORDER
| 编号 | 日期 | 案件进程 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-06-25 | COMPLAINT against THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, PARTNERSHIPS, AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A TO THE COMPLAINT. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-33044560)Document filed by emoji company GmbH. |
| 2 | 2026-06-25 | AO 120 FORM TRADEMARK - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review. |
| 3 | 2026-06-25 | CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. |
| 4 | 2026-06-25 | FIRST RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by emoji company GmbH. |
| 5 | 2026-06-25 | MOTION to Seal Schedule A, Exhibits 3 and 4 of the Hucke Declaration and Exhibits 2 and 3 of the Chambers declaration. Document filed by emoji company GmbH. |
| 6 | 2026-06-25 | EMERGENCY MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order. Document filed by emoji company GmbH. (Refer to ECF Rule 13.19(b) and (c) for directions regarding promptly alerting the court to this filing.) |
| 7 | 2026-06-25 | MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages and exceed word limit. Document filed by emoji company GmbH. |
| 8 | 2026-06-25 | MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: [6] EMERGENCY MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order. Document filed by emoji company GmbH. |
| 9 | 2026-06-25 | DECLARATION of ANDRES OLASCOAGA in Support re: [6] EMERGENCY MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order. Document filed by emoji company GmbH. |
| 16 | 2026-06-25 | ***SEALED***REDACTION to [5] MOTION to Seal Schedule A, Exhibits 3 and 4 of the Hucke Declaration and Exhibits 2 and 3 of the Chambers declaration. by emoji company GmbH (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Schedule A, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 3-1 to MH Declaration, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 3-2 to MH Declaration, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 3-3 to MH Declaration, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 3-4 to MH Declaration, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 3-5 to MH Declaration, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 3-6 to MH Declaration, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 3-7 to MH Declaration, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3-8 to MH Declaration, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3-9 to MH Declaration, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 3-10 to MH Declaration, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 3-11 to MH Declaration, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 3-12 to MH Declaration, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 3-13 to MH Declaration, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 3-14 to MH Declaration, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 4 to MH Declaration, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 2 to RC Declaration, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 3 to RC Declaration)Motion or Order to File Under Seal: [5]. |
| — | 2026-06-26 | ***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING PROPOSED ORDER. Document No. [17] Proposed Order was reviewed and approved as to form. |
| — | 2026-06-26 | ***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING PROPOSED ORDER. Document No. [18] Proposed Order was reviewed and approved as to form. |
| 19 | 2026-06-29 | ORDER granting [5] Motion to Seal; denying [6] Motion for TRO; denying as moot [7] Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. For the reasons stated herein, the motion for temporary restraining order, ECF No. 6, is DENIED. Additionally, Plaintiff's motion for leave to file excess pages, ECF No. 7, is DENIED AS MOOT. The Court notes that Plaintiff's memorandum of law in support of its motion for temporary restraining order exceed the Court's page limits by 33 pages, and the Court is unlikely to grant such a motion in the future if requests are similarly unreasonable. Plaintiff's motion to seal, ECF No. 5, is GRANTED. The Court finds the documents are "judicial documents" to which a high presumption of public access attaches. Mirlis v. Greer, 952 F.3d. 51, 58 (2d Cir. 2020). "[S]ealing of the documents may be justified only with specific, on-the-record findings that sealing is necessary to preserve higher values and only if the sealing order is narrowly tailored to achieve that aim." Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 124 (2d Cir. 2006). While the Court denies the motion for a temporary restraining order, the Court understands that public disclosure of the information filed under seal would, at this time, "cause significant competitive harm" to Plaintiff. Toretto v. Donnelley Fin. Sols., Inc., 583 F. Supp. 3d 570,608 (S.D.N.Y. 2022). Plaintiff shall, by July 6, 2026, file a letter on the docket proposing next steps in this litigation. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close ECF Nos. 5, 6, and 7. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Dale E. Ho on 6/29/2026) |
| 20 | 2026-07-06 | LETTER addressed to Judge Dale E. Ho from Marijan Hucke dated 07/06/2026 re: June 29 Order. Document filed by emoji company GmbH. |
| 21 | 2026-07-07 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: [20] Letter filed by emoji company GmbH ENDORSEMENT: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiffs letter. Leave Lo file a motion for preliminary injunction following the voluntary dismissal of misjoined defendants is GRANTED. Further, Plaintiffs motion alternative service is GRANTED. Given the temporary injunctive relief Plaintiff seeks, the Court has jurisdiction under the Hague Convention to permit alternative service. Fox Corp. v. Media Deportes Mex., S. de R.L. de C. V., 820 F. Supp. 3d 299, 306 (S.D.N.Y. 2026). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Dale E. Ho on 7/7/2026) |