墨婷跨境
MOT CROSS-BORDER
微信号: Mooting2018
墨婷跨境
MOT CROSS-BORDER
| 编号 | 日期 | 案件进程 |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | 2026-06-30 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 4 is granted. Plaintiff may file the documents identified in its motion 4 under seal. Mailed notice. |
| 8 | 2026-06-30 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Mary M. Rowland: Based on the allegations in Plaintiff's Complaint 1, the Court believes that a personal jurisdiction supplement is necessary to demonstrate this Court's personal jurisdiction over the Defendants. Plaintiff is reminded that personal jurisdiction over an online retailer is not established merely because the retailer's website is available in Illinois. Liu v. Monthly, No. 25-2074, 2026 WL 681773, at *2 (7th Cir. Mar. 9, 2026). Instead, minimum contacts with Illinois are found only where an Illinois customer actually purchased a product from the online retailer and the retailer shipped the product to Illinois. Id.; see also Curry v. Revolution Labs., LLC, 949 F.3d 385, 392-93 (7th Cir. 2020). To ensure the Court that personal jurisdiction over the Defendants exists, by 7/20/26, Plaintiff shall file a personal jurisdiction supplement as a separate entry on the docket. The supplement shall include a table with the following columns: (1) No.: the number corresponding to the Defendant's position in Schedule A; (2) Name: the name of the entity sued, e.g., the online account doing the alleged infringement; (3) Item Purchased: the name of the infringing item purchased from the Defendant; (4) Purchase Price: the amount paid for the item; (5) Ship to Address: the city in Illinois that the item was shipped to; (6) Date Received: the date the item was received at the Illinois address. If Plaintiff is relying on alternative means to establish personal jurisdiction that does not fit into this table format, Plaintiff shall explain how the alternative means establishes personal jurisdiction over each Defendant in the personal jurisdiction supplement. The Court will not consider any motions for TRO or preliminary injunctions until it is satisfied that personal jurisdiction over the Defendants has been established. Mailed notice. |
| 7 | 2026-06-24 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials |
| 6 | 2026-06-24 | MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 2026-06-24 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. | |
| 2026-06-24 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). | |
| 5 | 2026-06-24 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Hangzhou Yunma Interactive Technology Co., Ltd |
| 4 | 2026-06-24 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hangzhou Yunma Interactive Technology Co., Ltd to seal document Motion for Leave to File under Seal |
| 3 | 2026-06-24 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2 | 2026-06-24 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hangzhou Yunma Interactive Technology Co., Ltd by Qin Zhuang |
| 1 | 2026-06-24 | COMPLAINT filed by Hangzhou Yunma Interactive Technology Co., Ltd; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25289979. |