墨婷跨境
MOT CROSS-BORDER
微信号: Mooting2018
墨婷跨境
MOT CROSS-BORDER
| 编号 | 日期 | 案件进程 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-10-29 | COMPLAINT filed by Sega Corporation; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25880558. |
| 2 | 2026-10-30 | MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 3 | 2026-10-30 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Sega Corporation Exhibit 6, Parts 1-5 regarding complaint[1] |
| 4 | 2026-10-30 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Sega Corporation Schedule A regarding complaint[1] |
| 5 | 2026-10-30 | MOTION by Plaintiff Sega Corporation for Leave to File Certain Documents Under Seal |
| 6 | 2026-10-30 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 7 | 2026-10-30 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Sega Corporation |
| 8 | 2026-10-30 | Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Sega Corporation |
| 9 | 2026-10-30 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sega Corporation by Martin Francis Trainor |
| 10 | 2026-10-30 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sega Corporation by Alexander Whang |
| 11 | 2026-10-30 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sega Corporation by Sydney Paige Fenton |
| 12 | 2026-10-30 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sega Corporation by Victor Benjamin Chahin, Jr |
| 13 | 2026-11-03 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal [5] is entered and continued. Upon review of the complaint, the Court sua sponte raises the proprietary of joinder of 29 defendants in this case. See, e.g., Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. v. Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182 (N.D. Ill. 2020). By 11/9/2026, plaintiff shall file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder in light of the principles described in Estee Lauder. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint with a single defendant or a smaller subset of defendants along with its memorandum explaining specifically why each defendant is properly joined to all of the others. Estee Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 189. Further, upon review of the complaint, the Court advises Plaintiff that no motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order should be filed in this matter without counsel first evaluating whether a restraint of assets would capture more than sales from the allegedly infringing products. A court cannot impose an asset restraint "simply to establish a fund from which a later award of money damages can be satisfied." See Banister v. Firestone, No. 17 C 8940, 2018 WL 4224444, at *9 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 5, 2018); see also Wham-O Holding v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 12523, Dkt. 39 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 20, 2025). Mailed notice |
| 14 | 2026-11-04 | Notice of Withdrawal of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal by Sega Corporation |
| 15 | 2026-11-04 | AMENDED complaint by Sega Corporation against Tee Works USA |