墨婷跨境
MOT CROSS-BORDER
微信号: Mooting2018
墨婷跨境
MOT CROSS-BORDER
| 编号 | 日期 | 案件进程 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-11-04 | COMPLAINT filed by Netflix US, LLC, Netflix, Inc., Netflix Studios, LLC, Netflix Worldwide Entertainment, LLC; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25905335. |
| 2 | 2026-11-04 | Exhibit 1 |
| 3 | 2026-11-04 | Exhibit 2 |
| 4 | 2026-11-04 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiffs Netflix Studios, LLC, Netflix US, LLC, Netflix Worldwide Entertainment, LLC, Netflix, Inc. Schedule A regarding complaint[1] |
| 5 | 2026-11-04 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiffs Netflix Studios, LLC, Netflix US, LLC, Netflix Worldwide Entertainment, LLC, Netflix, Inc. Exhibit 3 regarding complaint[1] |
| 6 | 2026-11-04 | MOTION by Plaintiffs Netflix Studios, LLC, Netflix US, LLC, Netflix Worldwide Entertainment, LLC, Netflix, Inc. for leave to file under seal |
| 7 | 2026-11-04 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 8 | 2026-11-04 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Netflix Studios, LLC, Netflix US, LLC, Netflix Worldwide Entertainment, LLC, Netflix, Inc. |
| 9 | 2026-11-04 | Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Netflix Studios, LLC, Netflix US, LLC, Netflix Worldwide Entertainment, LLC, Netflix, Inc. |
| 10 | 2026-11-04 | CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
| 11 | 2026-11-04 | CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Albert Berry, III. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). |
| 12 | 2026-11-04 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Netflix Studios, LLC, Netflix US, LLC, Netflix Worldwide Entertainment, LLC, Netflix, Inc. by Justin R. Gaudio |
| 13 | 2026-11-04 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Netflix Studios, LLC, Netflix US, LLC, Netflix Worldwide Entertainment, LLC, Netflix, Inc. by Amy Crout Ziegler |
| 14 | 2026-11-04 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Netflix Studios, LLC, Netflix US, LLC, Netflix Worldwide Entertainment, LLC, Netflix, Inc. by Kahlia Roe Halpern |
| 15 | 2026-11-04 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Netflix Studios, LLC, Netflix US, LLC, Netflix Worldwide Entertainment, LLC, Netflix, Inc. by Madeline Halgren |
| 16 | 2026-11-04 | MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 17 | 2026-11-04 | Exhibit |
| 18 | 2026-11-04 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials |
| 19 | 2026-11-05 | AMENDED complaint by Netflix Studios, LLC, Netflix Worldwide Entertainment, LLC, Netflix, Inc., Netflix US, LLC against Babaite Family Exquisite Product 331 Store and terminating The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
| 20 | 2026-11-05 | Exhibit 1 |
| 21 | 2026-11-05 | Exhibit 2 |
| 22 | 2026-11-05 | Exhibit 3 |
| 23 | 2026-11-05 | Exhibit 4 |
| 24 | 2026-11-05 | Notice of Withdrawal of Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Under Seal by Netflix Studios, LLC, Netflix US, LLC, Netflix Worldwide Entertainment, LLC, Netflix, Inc. |
| 25 | 2026-11-05 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: This case has been assigned to Judge LaShonda A. Hunt. In light of Plaintiffs' amended complaint [14] and notice of withdrawal [15], the Clerk's office is directed, forthwith, to unseal the documents filed at [2] and [3] and to update the caption to reflect that the Defendant in this case is " Babaite Family Exquisite Product 331 Store". Upon review of Plaintiffs' amended complaint, the Court questions whether Plaintiffs have sufficiently alleged personal jurisdiction over Defendant. One of the exhibits to the complaint is a screenshot of a checkout page from Defendant's online store with the alleged infringing product, a Chicago shipping address, and the estimated total, but not a completed purchase [14-3]. "In the context of Schedule A litigation, a defendant's operation of an online store accessible in the forum state, combined with completed sales in the forum state, has been found sufficient to subject that defendant to personal jurisdiction." Liu v. Monthly, 170 F.4th 1090, 1093 (7th Cir. 2026). However, evidence that a defendant's store is merely accessible from the forum state is not enough. Id. (citing Curry v. Revolution Lab'ys, LLC, 949 F.3d 385, 400 (7th Cir. 2020)). Accordingly, Plaintiffs have not adequately pleaded that the Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant and must file proof of actual sales in Illinois by 11/12/26. Failure to do so will result in the complaint being dismissed without prejudice and this case being closed. Mailed notice (gel,) |