墨婷跨境
MOT CROSS-BORDER
微信号: Mooting2018
墨婷跨境
MOT CROSS-BORDER
| 编号 | 日期 | 案件进程 |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 2026-06-22 | Plaintiff's MOTION for clarification [19] Order, by SPURWEST TRADING COMPANY, LLC. Responses due by 7/6/2026. (desRosiers, Kelly Ann) |
| 3 | 2026-06-17 | ORDER DISMISSING [1] SHOTGUN COMPLAINT AND PERMITTING REPLEADING: Plaintiff may file an amended complaint that is consistent with this Order on or before June 30, 2026. (Without Prejudice) Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 6/17/2026. See attached document for full details. |
| 2 | 2026-06-16 | NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICES ON SEALING/REDACTION: Notwithstanding the requirements of Local Rule 5.4 and/or any protective order, the parties are prohibited from filing anything under seal or from redacting any content from a court filing or exhibit/attachment (except for the personal data identifiers listed in Section 6A of this District's CM/ECF Administrative Procedures) unless the party with a stated interest in sealing/redaction first seeks and obtains permission from the Court via a motion for leave. The motion for leave must be filed after meaningful conferral with the opposing party (or parties) and be filed publicly except as authorized by prior Court order. Additionally, the motion for leave shall specify the particularized basis for sealing the proposed material; shall describe the information/documents to be sealed with as much specificity as possible but without attaching the proposed sealed material; shall indicate the proposed duration of the seal request and the reasons why means other than sealing are unavailable or unsatisfactory; shall contain a separate certificate of conference section indicating the results of the parties' meaningful conferral; and shall be filed at last three business days before any related deadline to permit adequate Court consideration. The party seeking authorization to seal material shall not file or otherwise attach the subject material until the Court has ruled on the motion for leave. Finally, all parties are advised that mere designation of material as confidential and/or otherwise subject to a protective order does not bind the Court, does not supplant the requirements of the Local Rules on sealing, and does not otherwise relieve the party seeking sealing/redaction from justifying its request under applicable legal principals governing the presumption of public access to civil proceedings. Failure to comply with this Notice may result in immediate unsealing of any unauthorized shielded material. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 6/16/2026. |
| 1 | 2026-06-16 | Case transferred in from Florida Middle; Case Number 6:26-cv-01201. Electronic file including transfer order and docket sheet received. |