TRO / Schedule A 案件

26-cv-6791

案件基础信息

案件号
26-cv-6791
立案日期
2026-06-09
原告品牌
MUFC 曼彻斯特联足球俱乐部
原告律所
GBC
起诉州
IL
侵权类型
商标

案件进程

编号日期案件进程
172026-06-22MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), this case is dismissed without prejudice. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice.
162026-06-22NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Manchester United Football Club Limited as to VANTI BAG
152026-06-10MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Pursuant to the notice of withdrawal [14], plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal [4] is withdrawn. Mailed notice.
142026-06-10Notice of Withdrawal of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal by Manchester United Football Club Limited
132026-06-10AMENDED complaint by Manchester United Football Club Limited against VANTI BAG and terminating The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Exhibit 1 Exhibit 2
122026-06-10MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. Plaintiff has filed a complaint alleging infringement by 33 defendants. This case follows a pattern common to "Schedule A" cases where plaintiffs allege that defendants employ similar methods and "work in active concert" to infringe plaintiffs' intellectual property. But experience has shown that not all defendants named in a Schedule A case work together. More importantly, experience has shown that joinder under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 and 20 is rarely appropriate in Schedule A cases. Accordingly, the Court raises the propriety of joinder and requires the plaintiff to file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder at least 7 days before the filing of the motion for temporary restraining order. Alternatively, by the same date, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint and amended Schedule A reducing the number of defendants. However, if Plaintiff names multiple defendants, Plaintiff must show that joinder of those defendants is proper. The Court directs Plaintiff to this Court's standing order in Schedule A cases regarding joinder on the Court's website. The Seventh Circuit has clarified that establishing personal jurisdiction in Schedule A cases requires that plaintiffs show evidence, for each defendant, of actual sales to Illinois customers and of actual products shipped to Illinois. Liu v. Monthly, No. 25-2074, 2026 WL 880018, at *23 (7th Cir. Mar. 31, 2026). Mere evidence of being willing to ship to Illinois customers is insufficient. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint if additional evidence is needed to establish personal jurisdiction over each Defendant under this standard. Finally, the Seventh Circuit has also ruled that the Hague Convention does not permit service by email to defendants in China. Kangol LLC v. Hangzhou Chuanyue Silk Imp. & Exp. Co., 2026 WL 1502198, at *5 (7th Cir. May 29, 2026). If Plaintiff intends to move to effectuate service via email on defendants located in China, then Plaintiff's motion will need to provide individualized arguments for each such Defendant that the Hague Convention does not apply, supported by details of the good faith effort Plaintiff has taken to ascertain the address of each such defendant. Mailed notice.
112026-06-09ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Manchester United Football Club Limited by Jennifer Mary Younan CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
102026-06-09ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Manchester United Football Club Limited by Jennifer Van Nacht
92026-06-09ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Manchester United Football Club Limited by Amy Crout Ziegler
82026-06-09ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Manchester United Football Club Limited by Justin R. Gaudio
72026-06-09Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Manchester United Football Club Limited
62026-06-09NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Manchester United Football Club Limited
52026-06-09CIVIL Cover Sheet
42026-06-09MOTION by Plaintiff Manchester United Football Club Limited for leave to file under Seal
32026-06-09SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Manchester United Football Club Limited Exhibit 2 - Parts 1-2 regarding complaint[1]
22026-06-09SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Manchester United Football Club Limited Schedule A regarding complaint[1]
12026-06-09COMPLAINT filed by Manchester United Football Club Limited; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25227378. (Exhibit 1)

免费评估

如您已收到与本案件号相关的 TRO 邮件,可花 30 秒填写评估表,快速获取和解或应诉建议,并初步了解预计处理成本。

立即评估

案件咨询

如你已经收到平台冻结、律师函、TRO 通知或想进一步判断案件影响,可以直接联系我们团队做下一步咨询。

立即咨询
TRO查询 最新资讯 关于我们 联系我们