墨婷跨境
MOT CROSS-BORDER
微信号: Mooting2018
墨婷跨境
MOT CROSS-BORDER
| 编号 | 日期 | 案件进程 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-02-11 | COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-41486334 - Fee: $405. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party Edgar Murillo(pty:pla)) |
| 2 | 2026-02-11 | CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Edgar Murillo. |
| 3 | 2026-02-11 | CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties |
| 4 | 2026-02-11 | Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening)[1] Edgar Murillo. |
| 5 | 2026-02-18 | NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (ghap) |
| 6 | 2026-02-18 | NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed.(ghap) |
| 7 | 2026-02-18 | Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| 8 | 2026-02-18 | 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening)[1] as to Defendant 712 S. Grandview Street LLC. (ghap) |
| 9 | 2026-02-19 | The Complaint filed in this action asserts a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. �� 1201012213, and a claim for damages pursuant to Californias Unruh Civil Rights Act (Unruh Act), Cal. Civ. Code �� 5153. It appears that the Court possesses only supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim, and any other state law claim that Plaintiff may have alleged, pursuant to the Courts supplemental jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. � 1367(a).The supplemental jurisdiction statute reflects the understanding that, when deciding whether to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, a federal court should consider and weigh in each case, and at every stage of the litigation, the values of judicial economy, convenience, fairness, and comity. City of Chicago v. Intl Coll. of Surgeons, 522 U.S. 156, 173 (1997) (emphasis added) (quoting Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v. Cohill, 484 U.S. 343, 350 (1988)). The Court therefore ORDERS PLAINTIFF to SHOW CAUSE in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and any other state law claim asserted in the Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. � 1367(c).In responding to this Order to Show Cause, Plaintiff shall identify the amount of statutory damages Plaintiff seeks to recover. Plaintiff and Plaintiffs counsel shall also support their responses to the Order to Show Cause with declarations, signed under penalty of perjury, providing all facts necessary for the Court to determine if they satisfy the definition of a high frequency litigant as provided by California Code of Civil Procedure sections 425.55(b)(1) & (2). PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE A RESPONSE TO THIS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE BY NO LATER THAN TWO WEEKS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and other state law claims, if any, and the dismissal of that claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. � 1367(c).THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sce) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| 10 | 2026-02-19 | Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held |
| 11 | 2026-02-19 | Notice to Parties ADA Disability Access Litigation (ADR-20) |
| 12 | 2026-02-19 | Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held |
| 13 | 2026-03-05 | RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Edgar Murilloto Generic Text Only Entry, [9] Re: supplemental jurisdiction |
| 14 | 2026-03-06 | MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. 1367(c)(4). Plaintiff shall immediately serve a copy of this order on any Defendant that Plaintiff has already served and file a proof of such service with the Court within ten (10) days. Plaintiff shall include a copy of this order with service on any Defendant that Plaintiff has not yet served. |
| 15 | 2026-03-16 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Edgar Murillo. |