墨婷跨境
MOT CROSS-BORDER
微信号: Mooting2018
墨婷跨境
MOT CROSS-BORDER
| 编号 | 日期 | 案件进程 |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | 2026-05-08 | BRIEF: MEMORANDUM by Robert Bosch LLC Memorandum in Response to the May 4, 2026 Order [Dkt. No. 19] 1 attachment |
| 19 | 2026-05-04 | MINUTES: MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: By 5/28/26, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed or severed for improper joinder. Plaintiff is advised of the following: First, "[o]n motion or on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party." Fed. R. Civ. P. 21(a). Second, sua sponte review of the propriety of joinder in Schedule A cases is a regular practice of courts in this district because plaintiffs "routinely file these multi-defendant cases. using cookie-cutter complaints that allege in a conclusory manner that 'on information and belief' each infringing defendant is inter-connected with the others." Viking Arm AS v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 24-cv-1566, 2024 WL 2953105, at *1 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024). Third, "[c]ourts generally find that claims against different defendants arose out of the same transaction or occurrence only if there is a logical relationship between the separate causes of action." Estee Lauder Cosms. Ltd. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", 334 F.R.D. 182, 185 (N.D. Ill. 2020) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). Fourth, courts have held that "to be part of the same transaction requires shared, overlapping facts that give rise to each cause of action, and not just distinct, albeit coincidentally identical, facts." Id. (quoting In re EMC Corp., 677 F.3d 1351, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2012)). Fifth, courts have held that the allegation that multiple defendants have infringed on the same copyright or trademark in the same way "does not create the substantial evidentiary overlap required to find a similar transaction or occurrence." Roadget Bus. Pte. Ltd. v. Schedule A Defs., No. 23-cv-17036, 2024 WL 1858592, at *6 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 29, 2024) (collecting cases). Finally, courts have held that the allegation that defendants "share unique identifiers, such as design elements and similarities of the unauthorized products offered for sale," is not sufficient to establish joinder. Ilustrata Servicos Design, Ltd. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 21-cv-05993, 2021 WL 5396690, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 18, 2021); Art Ask Agency v. Individuals, Corps., Ltd. Liab. Cos., P'ships, & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 21-cv-06197, 2021 WL 5493226, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 23, 2021). Mailed notice. |
| 18 | 2026-04-30 | MOTION: MOTION by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC Plaintiff's Motion for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) 2 attachments |
| 17 | 2026-02-18 | MINUTES: MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion to conduct expedited discovery 16 is granted subject to the following limitations. Upon Plaintiff's request, any third party with actual notice of this Order who is providing services for the Defendant, or in connection with the Defendant Internet Store, including, without limitation, any online marketplace platforms such as Temu, LLC ("Temu") (the "Third Party Providers"), shall, within seven (7) calendar days after receipt of such notice, provide to Plaintiff expedited discovery, limited to copies of documents and records in such person's or entity's possession or control sufficient to determine: i. the identities and locations of Defendant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and any persons acting in active concert or participation with them, including all known contact information and all associated e-mail addresses. Mailed notice. |
| 16 | 2026-02-13 | MOTION: MOTION by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC to expedite Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery |
| 15 | 2026-02-13 | DECLARATION: DECLARATION of Jay Paragoso 2 attachments |
| 14 | 2026-02-09 | MINUTES: MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion to unseal docket No. 9 [12] is granted. The Clerk is directed to unseal [9]. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal, [8], is denied as moot. Mailed notice. |
| 13 | 2026-02-06 | EMAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 12 | 2026-02-05 | MOTION: MOTION by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC to unseal document Plaintiff's Motion to Unseal Docket No. 9 |
| — | 2026-02-05 | ADMIN: CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (Text entry; no document attached.) |
| 11 | 2026-02-05 | NOTICE: Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Robert Bosch LLC |
| 10 | 2026-02-05 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Robert Bosch LLC |
| 9 | 2026-02-05 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC Sealed Schedule A |
| 8 | 2026-02-05 | MOTION: MOTION by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal |
| 7 | 2026-02-05 | APPEARANCE: ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC by Elizabeth Aubree Miller |
| 6 | 2026-02-05 | APPEARANCE: ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC by John Wilson |
| 5 | 2026-02-05 | APPEARANCE: ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC by Robert Payton Mcmurray |
| 4 | 2026-02-05 | APPEARANCE: ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC by William Benjamin Kalbac |
| 3 | 2026-02-05 | APPEARANCE: ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC by Michael A. Hierl |
| 2 | 2026-02-05 | ADMIN: CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 1 | 2026-02-05 | COMPLAINT: COMPLAINT filed by Robert Bosch LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24687550. 1 attachment |